Thread:WhoThisHere/@comment-37950665-20190611144659/@comment-39775049-20190611153558

Okay then - I was trying to at least to be constructive I promise and not just brawl.

Also it does have historic relevance in it being used in a singular manner: "They with a singular antecedent goes back to the Middle English of the 14th century[16][17] "

It's also what I do even now hear seen being said too (such as - "they'll (plural police) catch them (single criminal)"/"they've been breaking into garages")

As for the "Knights" - even on the wiki page about them, it's been listed that woman have been capable of picking up blades and doing the role.

Thus, the potential of it being gender exclusive (like certain Mantles are, for instance) being ruled out.

(To be clear, just in case: I'm not trying to insinuate the Egyptian was necessarily a woman. Just that we don't know enough at all what they were, either way.)

It seems they're all just simply called that, Knights rather than dames, whether male or not.

(Are you sure? Wikipedia comes with it several citations which might help if you want a "quick" way for a few at least that doesn't bug up your notifications :) )